j0j0 at riod.ca
Mon Sep 5 18:47:15 GMT 2005
Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 10:14 -0600, Brad Henry wrote:
>>The question that arises from this is: Would we want that behaviour
>>automated within the libnet_join code, or would it be better to have
>>explicit 'demote' and 'promote' functions in libnet provided as net
>>commands, for example? The automated behaviour would be nice, but
>>accidentally demoting a dc because you were ssh'd into the wrong host
>>and typed 'net join <domain> member' would not. :)
>IMHO it is best to have explicit promote/demote commands, creating a DC
>is not an everyday task and probably needs extra care.
Thanks Simo! The more I thought about it, the more I realized that
there isn't really another option.
This patch includes the changes to use talloc_steal() in a type-safe
way, and prevents a current member server from performing any dc join
steps if asked to. It's an 'svk diff' of libnet_join.c against the
current SOC/SAMBA_4_0 branch, r10036.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 17932 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050905/dc4021d4/libnet_join.c.bin
More information about the samba-technical