move adt_tree.c (virtual registry tree) to new talloc()

[Simo Sorce]

On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 09:07 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:47:52PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > Here's a small patch to move the ADT which forms the base for
> > our virtual registry tree to a talloc based structure.  Simple
> > patch but review welcome.
> 
> The only comment I have is one of taste: When I touch things like this, I try
> to get rid of the typedefs for structs. I don't see much of a difference in
> typing 'struct sorted_tree' instead of 'SORTED_TREE', only that I like the
> former more.

I have the same feeling, struct sorted_tree is better.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce    -  idra at samba.org
Samba Team    -  http://www.samba.org
Italian Site  -  http://samba.xsec.it