move adt_tree.c (virtual registry tree) to new talloc()

Simo Sorce idra at
Sat Sep 3 07:11:47 GMT 2005

On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 09:07 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:47:52PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > Here's a small patch to move the ADT which forms the base for
> > our virtual registry tree to a talloc based structure.  Simple
> > patch but review welcome.
> The only comment I have is one of taste: When I touch things like this, I try
> to get rid of the typedefs for structs. I don't see much of a difference in
> typing 'struct sorted_tree' instead of 'SORTED_TREE', only that I like the
> former more.

I have the same feeling, struct sorted_tree is better.


Simo Sorce    -  idra at
Samba Team    -
Italian Site  -

More information about the samba-technical mailing list