[SAMBA4] When to fallback to NTLMSSP?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 09:38:12AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I'm interested in ideas, both from the 'secure' and 'sane behaviour'
> > standpoint.
> 
> If it is not to difficult to implement I think that having a fine
> grained (ldb based ?) control set would be the best choice.

Just my 2 cents: To me this sounds too complicated. This needs to be *SIMPLE*.
Anything more complex than setting 'security level = 5' or something similar is
bound to fail in real world installations.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20051030/f2017ca8/attachment.bin