[PATCH] Shared samba build
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at vernstok.nl
Wed Oct 26 13:25:43 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> JV> There's no point in building *everything* shared. For example,
> JV> LIBNDR makes sense as a shared library, but there's no point
> in JV> also building NDR_RAW and NDR_COMPRESSION as shared libs.
> They JV> should be included in libndr.so.
>
> Yes, of course, but we should provide as much flexibility as we
> can. Another part of the problem that appears to be build system
> problem too is module loading/building.
>
> Does anyone use loadable modules now?
Nope, not yet. All modules so far are built staticly.
Cheers,
Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDX4PXPa9Uoh7vUnYRAjs7AJ0YSSu4Wk/nmGnWCoK4zuDaa/B35QCeMfO/
sj0kWA9N8Jty8Q2C4a7mBNQ=
=WTVz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list