[PATCH] Shared samba build

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at vernstok.nl
Wed Oct 26 13:25:43 GMT 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Peter,

Peter Novodvorsky wrote:

> JV> There's no point in building *everything* shared. For example,
> JV> LIBNDR makes sense as a shared library, but there's no point
> in JV> also building NDR_RAW and NDR_COMPRESSION as shared libs.
> They JV> should be included in libndr.so.
>
> Yes, of course, but we should provide as much flexibility as we
> can. Another part of the problem that appears to be build system
> problem too is module loading/building.
>
> Does anyone use loadable modules now?

Nope, not yet. All modules so far are built staticly.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDX4PXPa9Uoh7vUnYRAjs7AJ0YSSu4Wk/nmGnWCoK4zuDaa/B35QCeMfO/
sj0kWA9N8Jty8Q2C4a7mBNQ=
=WTVz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the samba-technical mailing list