reply_unlink

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:52:27AM +0200, Nadav Danieli wrote:
> 
> Once agin I have to apologize for talking about about samba with no
> reason to do so.

No problem, I do that all the time :-).

> The "blocking locks" and "locking" parameters were both "no", and are
> required for this test. With a minimal conf file the test runs well.
> As for the race condition, I can only live with those that do not
> happen, those that do I fix. It has no overhead over current
> implementation, does the job right, and actually has 2 less lines of
> code (3.0.7 source)

If you have a fix please send in a patch so I can examine it.

Thanks,

	Jeremy.