samba 4: a new configuration system?
tpot at samba.org
Thu Jun 23 05:22:12 GMT 2005
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 21:55 -0700, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> > I don't think that issue has been resolved yet but I am guessing that if
> > the configuration file format is changed it will involved ldb somehow.
> I hope not. I realize I am "old school", and I fully realize
> I am NOT a decision maker here, but dammit what's so bloody
> wrong about flat text files that can be modified with "vi" or
> *emacs*? We don't need to turn Samba in *)&$^%& windows.
Sure - I understand your arguments here. I was just pointing out that
last time this topic was discussed I remember that ldb was one of the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050623/9e585b0b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical