[Performance] Samba 3 vs. Samba 4 performance in NetBench
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jun 21 20:11:09 GMT 2005
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:03:37PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Well the default on NTFS is non-sparse, and you have to explicitly
> set a file sparse to select that, so I'm guessing that netbench
> is just doing a good simulation of what Word actually does - ie. it
> always does the one-byte allocation write.
I doubt Word has its fingers sticking in here. I've seen it with cygwin dd as
well, and this for almost 100% certain does sequential writes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050621/4eeeb824/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical