RPC-SAMLOGON on the buildfarm

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 10 23:38:44 GMT 2005

On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 09:34 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:07 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > do we need to run RPC-SAMLOGON with each option in test_rpc.sh
> > 
> > it's the ulimit that lets the buildfarm hosts failing...
> > 
> > I see currently about 20 CPU minutes and it's only at
> > RPC-SAMLOGON on ncacn_ip_tcp with spnego
> > 
> > and with RPC-SAMLOGON removed completly it's just using 2:30 CPU mins
> > for the whole test_rpc.sh
> I'll slim it down a little, but the operations it performs are almost
> the same as the schannel test, except for the extensive testing of
> different logon types.  These are almost certainly unaffected by the
> underlying authentication (indeed, it forced to guest for the CIFS
> layer).
> So, yes, feel free to just run it once per transport.

On further thought, you still need to make sure it (and DRSUAPI for that
matter) is run under bigendian, validate and the other non-
authentication options.

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.        http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050611/09a35357/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list