svn commit: samba r8856 - in branches/SOC/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/rpc: .

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 14:06 +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Richard,
> 
>  > Hmmm, I thought we preferred to avoid C++ style comments in our C code?
> 
> It's not just a preference, it breaks the build with some of our
> supported hosts.
> 
> Brad, please fix, thanks

While it might not matter for the SOC branch, the important part of
following the code style is to make it easier to merge things back
if/when the project is successful.

We do have a rather odd set of coding rules these days, a mix of
'requires C99' and 'must be C89 comments'.  I'm sure this is sort of
written down somewhere, but for code in the main tree, tridge's new
mailbomb script should ensure that build at samba.org tells you when you
stuff up :-)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.        http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050730/74ce173f/attachment.bin