svn commit: samba r8759 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: libnet torture/libnet

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Mon Jul 25 22:11:01 GMT 2005


On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 22:00 +0000, mimir at samba.org wrote:
> Author: mimir
> Date: 2005-07-25 22:00:56 +0000 (Mon, 25 Jul 2005)
> New Revision: 8759
> 
> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=8759
> 
> Log:
> Another couple of fields in usermod routine.

The libnet API provides some useful abstractions, but I'm missing what
is the benefit of this abstraction over directly setting the
user_info_21 and the fields_present flag.  Would it not be more complete
and less complex for the caller to set this directly?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.        http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050726/a4548cba/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list