Version 4 LDAP particulars?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:17 +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
> >NTLM is already supported, and I actually do intend to link to Cyrus
> >SASL when available, or locally implement CRAM-MD5 (it is a 'mandetory
> >to implement' part of the LDAPv3 spec).
> 
> CRAM-MD5 is not mandatory to implement, see RFC 2829.

Oops, I got my MD5 mechs mixed up :-).  It's DIGEST-MD5 that RFC 2829
mandates.  Anyway, I'm going to investigate how well we can handle the
call-out to Cyrus-SASL to handle things like CRAM-MD5.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050130/13daf377/attachment.bin