svn commit: samba r4440 -
inbranches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server: common srvsvc
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Sun Jan 2 10:56:50 GMT 2005
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:23:54AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:01:29AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> >> Hi Chris,
> >> yep I mean this '$' shares which have the 0x80000000 flag set on the
> >> share
> >> type
> >> please read the full changeset for details, I use the "browseable = no"
> >> option for this in samba4, I don't know if samba3 does it the same
> >> way...
> > browseable = no has a different meaning.
> > The '$' names are supposed to be handled on the client side. They work
> > sort of like the .files in Unix. The server side shouldn't be filtering
> > them out.
> the server should do that, that's the difference between
> NetShareEnum and NetShareEnumAll in our server code,
> run the RPC-SRVSVC smbtorture test against a w2k3 box, to see the difference
Keeping in mind that I'm a little out of sync with the code...
I'm thinking in terms of what I see on the wire.
On the wire, NetShareEnum call is a RAP call (the RPC version is
NetrShareEnum)... and it provides the $ names.
If these are RPC calls, then... well, the naming isn't what I'm used to
seeing but otherwise I'm not up to speed on the RPC calls.
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the samba-technical