svn commit: samba r12544 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch
jra at samba.org
Wed Dec 28 23:07:38 GMT 2005
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:15:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Sorry - thought that was already being initialized.
> > Thanks for the fix.
> I also thought about converting the tables to static initializers. It's an
> additional 256k per binary and per differently run program. For normal
> operation that's smbd, nmbd and winbind that don't share the tables, adding up
> to .5 Meg more footprint. But we are sure then we always have them.
> What do you think?
Hmmm. Dunno - let me think about it (bedtime here now :-). We currently
just mmap them. I wish there were a nice way to force initialization on
startup without having to do a function call to check lazy initialization.
More information about the samba-technical