Transactions into ldb js?
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Dec 28 10:45:01 GMT 2005
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:41 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 20:23 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Should we push transactions up into the ldb js layer?
> > Yes we should, as we may need that later when doing some complex and
> > critical tree operation via the swat2 interface.
> I added transactions to the ejs interface in rev 11474 a couple of months ago:
So I noticed. Why I didn't see it in the js is beyond me. This does
however raise the question: Why does it take so long to provision, and
are there ways to speed it up?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20051228/9a98211b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical