Transactions into ldb js?

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at
Wed Dec 28 10:45:01 GMT 2005

On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:41 +1100, tridge at wrote:
> Simo,
>  > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 20:23 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>  > > Should we push transactions up into the ldb js layer?
>  > 
>  > Yes we should, as we may need that later when doing some complex and
>  > critical tree operation via the swat2 interface.
> I added transactions to the ejs interface in rev 11474 a couple of months ago:

So I noticed.  Why I didn't see it in the js is beyond me.  This does
however raise the question:  Why does it take so long to provision, and
are there ways to speed it up?

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                      
Authentication Developer, Samba Team 
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list