Name Change for Samba4? [Re: What is blocking a Samba4
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Fri Dec 23 15:26:15 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
tridge at samba.org wrote:
> What the Linux distros do is up to them. In the case
> of apache many distros have a separate "apache"
> and "apache2" package, and that certainly makes life a
> lot easier for administrators who want to specifically
> use one or the other. I would not be surprised if the
> distros do something very similar with Samba 3.x
> and Samba 4.x. I don't think we should force this
> on them though, and I think that when Samba 4.0 is
> eventually release it should be called samba-4.0.tar.gz
> on the samba.org download, just like our previous
> major releases.
I think the main different between Samba 3/4 and Apache 1/2
is that users will want to install Samba 3 & 4 at the same
time for the foreseeable future. I predict that the adoption
path with be Samba 4 as a AD DC and Samba 3 as the file/print
server. So this makes a huge difference in packaging.
Feel free to do what ever you want. I'm just throwing
out my predictions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical