proposition of further changes in dcerpc code
mimir at samba.org
Mon Dec 5 18:45:36 GMT 2005
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:58:03PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:51:01PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > > I have some comments...
> > Great!
> One comment from my side: Why the parameter structure? Why don't you hand all
> the parameters to the _send function?
1) Because it's uniform with the rest of composite functions - I kind of
used to structure interface here... (yes, I know there's no in/out
substructures, but it's probably going to be)
2) Because it's easier to write a code (script/something) that handles
it automatically. For instance, there were attempts to autogenerate
parts of ejs code - if some functions are called similiar way, it is
less painful to deal with them.
Samba Team member http://www.samba.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20051205/de51332b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical