samba 3.0.20 vs. 3.0.14a dbench failure
abartlet at samba.org
Sun Aug 21 23:31:39 GMT 2005
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 18:19 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> I am seeing a possible problem with Samba 3.0.20 under stress.
> Not enough information yet, but it would really help if there were a way
> to log response time averages and high water mark response time for
> various types of SMBs --- on the smbd server side (ethereal can do this
> but it might affect the response times). Any ideas how to get what
> smbd thinks the response time for various request types are?
What about ethereal on a router between the two boxes, or ethereal on
the client? Otherwise, I always go back to a 10baseT hub, but that
really will kill the response times ;-)
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050822/15f5af2a/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical