samba 3.0.20 vs. 3.0.14a dbench failure

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 18:19 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> I am seeing a possible problem with Samba 3.0.20 under stress.

> Not enough information yet, but it would really help if there were a way 
> to log response time averages and high water mark response time for 
> various types of SMBs --- on the smbd server side (ethereal can do this 
> but it might affect the response times).     Any ideas how to get what 
> smbd thinks the response time for various request types are?

What about ethereal on a router between the two boxes, or ethereal on
the client? Otherwise, I always go back to a 10baseT hub, but that
really will kill the response times ;-)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.        http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050822/15f5af2a/attachment.bin