Subject: compatibility between SRVTOOLS and Samba-PDC .Help!

[Douglas Sterner]

the usrmgr /svrmgr tools works fine we use them exclusively even for 
activating  VPN access on a user account. I suggest you look into your 
idealx scripts.


>From: samba-technical-request at lists.samba.org
>Reply-To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>Subject: samba-technical Digest, Vol 32, Issue 4
>Date: Thu,  4 Aug 2005 12:05:29 +0000 (GMT)
>
>Send samba-technical mailing list submissions to
>	samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	samba-technical-request at lists.samba.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	samba-technical-owner at lists.samba.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of samba-technical digest..."


>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. unix charset = latin prevents umlauts in new password
>       (Ingo Steuwer)
>    2. TDB database compatibility with 32/64-bit Samba build
>       (Albert Chin)
>    3. High-quality Software needed for Phone-call/Modem "sharing"
>       (Callglob)
>    4. Re: TDB database compatibility with 32/64-bit Samba build
>       (Jeremy Allison)
>    5. compatibility between SRVTOOLS and Samba-PDC .Help! (kunyliu)
>    6. Automated Reply from commercial
>       <commercial at www.alseportage.com> (commercial)



>From: Ingo Steuwer <steuwer at univention.de>
>To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>Subject: unix charset = latin prevents umlauts in new password
>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:59:24 +0200
>Hi
>
>if I set "unix charset = latin" in smb.conf (3.0.14a/debian sarge) I can 
>use
>smbclient and rpcclient in my environment (which doesn't use utf8) with
>passwords containing german umlauts and change it to any new one using
>smbpasswd.
>
>I can also authenticate with my Windows-XP Domain Member using this 
>password,
>but what I can not do is change my password to a new password with umlauts.
>
>From the users view this is even more strange since samba sends an
>NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD, which leads windows to acclaim that the old
>password was wrong while the failure was generated by the new one. New
>passwords without umlauts will work fine. Setting "unix charset" to default
>also works.
>
>I can send you the log if interrested.
>
>Regards
>Ingo Steuwer
>
>--
>Ingo Steuwer       steuwer at univention.de         fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
>Entwicklung        Linux for Your Business
>Univention GmbH    http://www.univention.de/     fax: +49 421 22 232-99
>





>From: Albert Chin <samba-technical at mlists.thewrittenword.com>
>Reply-To: samba-technical at samba.org
>To: samba-technical at samba.org
>Subject: TDB database compatibility with 32/64-bit Samba build
>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:38:44 -0500
>We have 32-bit and 64-bit versions of samba-3.0.14 for Solaris
>10/SPARC. If we use Samba and therefore create tdb databases using the
>32-bit build, will these be compatible with the 64-bit build and
>vice-versa?







>From: "Callglob" <callglobal99 at callglobal.cc>
>To: <samba-technical at lists.samba.org>
>Subject: High-quality Software needed for Phone-call/Modem "sharing" Date: 
>Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:15:18 -0400
>Hello,
>
>We are seeking software to support a single line dial-up access being 
>shared with telco calls but more than the "on-hold" feature, it facilitates 
>an actual call while surfing is being "held" for a reasonable time period, 
>say 5 to 10 minutes or even "back and forth" communication between the call 
>and sufring action much like a call-waiting function.
>
>David Joseph
>





>From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
>Reply-To: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
>To: samba-technical at samba.org
>Subject: Re: TDB database compatibility with 32/64-bit Samba build
>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:20:14 -0700
>On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:38:44PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > We have 32-bit and 64-bit versions of samba-3.0.14 for Solaris
> > 10/SPARC. If we use Samba and therefore create tdb databases using the
> > 32-bit build, will these be compatible with the 64-bit build and
> > vice-versa?
>
>Yeah, the persistent databases format should be identical between
>machines of different architectures as well as different integer
>size and endianness. The "cache" tdb's are not portable but then
>they are re-created on statrup anyway.
>
>If it doesn't work it's a bug.
>
>Jeremy.
>





>From: kunyliu <kunyliu at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: kunyliu <kunyliu at gmail.com>
>To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>Subject: compatibility between SRVTOOLS and Samba-PDC .Help!
>Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:49:37 +0800
>I want to use NT4's SRVTOOLS to manage the Samba-PDC,But when i use it ,i
>mean ,when i add a account for windows,Samba can only receive the username
>from the tool. The others ,such as logon_path,Fullname and Description
>cannot be received by samba. Is some thing wrong with samba?
>  what can i do ?
>  I add the information of a user to the LDAP-server by LDIF-file handly 
>.It
>works fine.And the SRVTOOLS can read it correctly.
>  Can samba receive all the informations from SRVTOOLS?
>





>From: commercial  <commercial at www.alseportage.com>
>To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>Subject: Automated Reply from commercial <commercial at www.alseportage.com>
>Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 11:13:23 +0200
>Votre message nous a bien été transmis. Nous y répondrons au plus vite.
>
>Cordialement
>L'équipe Alse
>
>
>






>_______________________________________________
>samba-technical mailing list
>samba-technical at lists.samba.org
>https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/