utmp update for bsd systems (try 2)
mickey at lucifier.net
Fri Apr 15 14:10:26 GMT 2005
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from David Lee:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> > re
> > i have posted this before but received no response...
> > is there anybod reading on this address?
> > cu
> > ----- Forwarded message (env-from mickey) -----
> > re
> > this is a patch against samba-2.2.12p0 and adds support
> > for updating utmp on bsds. code similarly ripped from
> > openbsd's ftpd (;
> > cu
> > [...]
> (Replying as original author of Samba's utmp code, but now long away from
> active Samba participation.)
> Thanks for looking at utmp-for-BSD. Whilst there might not be many takers
> for this combination (judging by fact it has been lacking for so long!),
> it would still be a worthwhile addition to slot into the utmp code. As
> you'll have spotted, I tried to identify the likely issues in the code as
> comments, and to leave hooks for someone like you for to use later.
> As John T. mentioned in his reply, Samba 2.2 is no longer actively
of course. i've heard that.
> But I would warmly encourage you to try to re-cast, and test, your patch
> onto a reasonably recent 3.0.x version. Even if the patch doesn't drop in
> cleanly first time, I suspect the changes would be small, as I suspect the
> code has remained relatively unchanged for several years.
> [Note: there is a currently live issue on the very latest "released then
> retracted 3.0.14" version, so either step back a version (3.0.13) or wait
> a couple of days until that issue is fixed.]
this function is still empty in 3.0.* and api seems to be the same.
since actual code does not use any samba's own functions i do not see
any reasons it will not work. unfortunately i run samba in production
and cannot just replace it w/ other versions that are not too stable
at the moment.
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
More information about the samba-technical