svn commit: samba r6219 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source:
tridge at osdl.org
Thu Apr 7 07:55:22 GMT 2005
> My guess is that the absence of Extended Security Exchanges in the NegProt
> response capabilities word is triggering one less bit in the negotiate
I think that is highly unlikely, but please do test the theory.
I think it is more likely that lack of NetrServerAuthenticate3 or
something else at the RPC level is what triggers the behaviour. You
could test this by blocking NetrServerAuthenticate3 using either a
hacked up sockspy, or using a modification to the rpc proxy backend in
> However, the problem seems to be that in dcerpc_pipe_connect_ncacn_np we
> throw away all information about what the server told us it was capable
no, we don't throw away information like that, but we do hide it deep
in the structures as it is almost always wrong to use that information
at this level.
If you really truly think it is the right way to do this, and have
good evidence that this is the case, then the capabilities are
available in the smb_private structure in dcerpc_smb.c, in
but please don't just take a guess at this and use that variable. I
will be quite surprised if it is the correct approach.
PS: Thanks for backing out the previous changes!
More information about the samba-technical