Raw client library, errors and header values
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Apr 5 23:30:36 GMT 2005
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 16:08 -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > I was trying to modify the BASIC-SECLEAK test to also detect what vuid
> > was returned for failed logins, so the client does not (as richard
> > reported) perform a LogoffAndX on that vuid. (I also need to fix his
> > server-side segfault for that action).
> I noticed that a real Windows logon does much the same as we do. That is,
> when it returns NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING to an SessionSetup&X, it also
> returns a non-zero User ID (vuid), and it does that with the response to
> the final SessSetup&X, even if the response is STATUS_LOGON_FAILED.
> The Windows client then does a Logoff&X, to which the server returns Bad
> User ID.
Ok, in which case I'll just fix the LogoffAndX segfault then. :-)
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050406/46815d87/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical