[Fwd: [Samba] "strict locking = yes" 3.X Default?]
eroseme at emonster.rose.hp.com
Thu Sep 23 22:29:28 GMT 2004
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Samba] "strict locking = yes" 3.X Default?
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:29:11 -0700
From: eric roseme <eroseme at emonster.rose.hp.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Re-post from samba to samba-technical
On Samba 3.x the "strict locking" default is yes (loadparm.c). On 2.2
it was no. I am just wondering why the change was made. "strict
locking" can affect performance significantly, so I am assuming that
there is a benefit for the average user that offsets whatever the
performance affect is.
Also, the SWAT help for strict locking on 3.x still says the default is no.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
More information about the samba-technical