svn commit: samba r2444 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: include lib passdb

Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
Tue Sep 21 10:37:02 GMT 2004


On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:25, Richard Renard wrote:
> I think this the right way to handle Samba attributes to delete, this 
> way we can avoid objectClass violation.
> I tested it yesterday night and it seems to be working well.
> 
> Maybe we could also invert operations order in srv_samr.c from
> delete unix side then samba side
> to
> delete samba side then unix side
> 
> this way we can avoid the return of NT_STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE when the 
> unix script deletes the full entry.
> but maybe there are some historical issues I am not aware of concerning 
> the order of deletes.

I fully agree, if there are no problems in changing the order I stand
for applying the patch.

Simo.
-- 
Simo Sorce    -  idra at samba.org
Samba Team    -  http://www.samba.org
Italian Site  -  http://samba.xsec.it



More information about the samba-technical mailing list