svn commit: samba r2444 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source:
include lib passdb
idra at samba.org
Tue Sep 21 10:37:02 GMT 2004
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:25, Richard Renard wrote:
> I think this the right way to handle Samba attributes to delete, this
> way we can avoid objectClass violation.
> I tested it yesterday night and it seems to be working well.
> Maybe we could also invert operations order in srv_samr.c from
> delete unix side then samba side
> delete samba side then unix side
> this way we can avoid the return of NT_STATUS_CANNOT_DELETE when the
> unix script deletes the full entry.
> but maybe there are some historical issues I am not aware of concerning
> the order of deletes.
I fully agree, if there are no problems in changing the order I stand
for applying the patch.
Simo Sorce - idra at samba.org
Samba Team - http://www.samba.org
Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
More information about the samba-technical