Samba-3.0.7-1.3E Active Directory Issues
nalin at redhat.com
Wed Oct 27 21:02:31 GMT 2004
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:53:14PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:48:21PM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> > I hadn't considered using mk_req/rd_req that way, but I can't think of
> > any reason why it wouldn't work, and it'd probably take less code. Are
> > you already working on such a change, or should I give it a go?
> I'm already working on it - but *any* kerberos code is just really painful
> and nasty :-) so it may take a little while. BTW, your patch as stands leaks
> memory (the enctype array isn't freed). This is usual with kerberos code (I've
> never received a kerberos patch that didn't fail valgrind in some way :-) so
> I'm going to have to do it 'slow and steady' :-(. I'd appreciate some
> feedback though - can I post you my changes as I go and have you review them ?
I'll be happy to look at anything you have there, though as you've
noticed, I'm not an expert on these things.
More information about the samba-technical