secrets.tdb - byte order independent? (SPARC/INTEL)

[Tim Potter]

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:05AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:02:56PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > You are asking for problems. Don't put tdb's on an nfs share
> > at all (IMHO).
> 
> I'd be a *lot* more strict about that. When talking Linux, use ext3 for the
> tdb's. Reiser is known to destroy them. No idea about XFS and JFS, but ext3 is
> known to be good.

This sounds serious - has anyone reported it to the Resier development
team?


Tim.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040310/fe9d518b/attachment.bin