Question about how to compare NFS and CIFS
David Collier-Brown
David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Mon Feb 9 14:43:58 GMT 2004
1) Features
i) per-user versus per-machine authentication.
Samba does the former, as doies pc-nfs, regular nfs
does the latter.
ii) AD support - samba natively, NFS with external tools only
iii) etc, etc
Performance
Hard to quantify: On Linux, SMB performance improved
substantially with the new kernel.
Best done by benchmarking: I've used dbench to stress
nfs servers in the past, and that tools uses the
same loads and smbtorture, so you can do **oredr of
magnitude** compariusons. Just don't expect 10% differences
to be significant (;-))
Somsak wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to ask you about did you have compare NFS and CIFS.
>
> Thanks for advanced.
>
> Somsak O.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, | some people and astonish the rest.
Toronto, Ontario, | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 or x52849 | davecb at canada.sun.com
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list