CVS update: samba4/source/torture

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 08:25:59AM -0800, Matt Seitz wrote:
> Ronan Waide wrote:
> >Because while free(NULL) is a no-op per the specs, there are libc's
> >that will fall over when you try to do it, perhaps?
> 
> Thank you for the explanation.  I didn't realize there were C Libraries in 
> production use that broke such a basic Standard C requirement.

Ha ! To quote slashdot at -1 "you're new here, aren't you" :-).

There are C libraries in production that break almost *every*
Standard C requirement :-) :-).

Jeremy.