CVS update: samba4/source/torture

Matt Seitz seitz at
Wed Feb 4 16:25:59 GMT 2004

Ronan Waide wrote:
> Because while free(NULL) is a no-op per the specs, there are libc's
> that will fall over when you try to do it, perhaps?

Thank you for the explanation.  I didn't realize there were C Libraries in 
production use that broke such a basic Standard C requirement.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list