Close samba-cvs mailing list?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 18:50, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 11:35:25AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> > I'm guessing it would be unpopular.
> > 
> 
> I would not like that either.

What I'm trying to understand is why - we discussed this morning about
how people find it hard to follow that any Samba development occurs, and
given the now reduced volume on samba-cvs, why shouldn't it be on the
main list?

If people can't/wont describe their development in great detail on
samba-technical@ before they commit, why not at least describe it there
after it?

My hope is that this would make the list more relevant, particularly
given recent complaints to that effect.

Andrew Bartlett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040813/7c72382f/attachment.bin