svn commit: samba r1720 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/utils
tpot at samba.org
Thu Aug 12 05:43:45 GMT 2004
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:43:42PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Tim Potter wrote:
> > You're thinking in terms of CVS! Branches in subversion are just
> > directories so there's no reason why you can't have a single changeset
> > that touches files in multiple branches.
> But isn't that bad practice, in the sense that you cannot choose to revert
> a change in only one branch then? When you revert, you revert from both
I don't think you can revert a change anyway, just make subsequent changes
that undo previous ones (i.e you still have a record of every transaction
made to the tree).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040812/4a4a19ba/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical