svn commit: samba r113 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/simple

[Simo Sorce]

Given that we are going to have a saner model for samba4, wouldn't it be
better to avoid having this kind of parameters back, and instead relying
only on permissions on shares ?

Simo.

On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 13:30, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Author: tridge
> Date: 2004-04-07 11:30:59 +0000 (Wed, 07 Apr 2004)
> New Revision: 113
> 
> Modified:
>    branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/simple/vfs_simple.c
> Log:
> added support for "read only = yes" in simple backend
> 
> 
> 
> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/listing.php?rep=0&path=/&rev=113&sc=1
-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo, 39 - 20133 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2953 4143 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399