[PATCH] LDAP suffix behaviour

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Sep 12 00:39:56 GMT 2003

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 10:15, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> > It seems much more intuitive w.r.t the parameter's name to keep the current 
> > behaviour and correct documentation accordingly.
> > I assume all lazy typists out there will agree( as well as reducing the 
> > chances for typos in config files )
> I thought the as documented behaviour was more logical, but then again
> I only write this stuff, not actually use it.  (-:

Personally, I like the solution that metze was proposing - but never had
the energy to fight that particular battle...

(sorry, can't find the mailing list ref atm).

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030912/dd78f7be/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list