[PATCH] LDAP suffix behaviour

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 10:15, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> 
> > It seems much more intuitive w.r.t the parameter's name to keep the current 
> > behaviour and correct documentation accordingly.
> > I assume all lazy typists out there will agree( as well as reducing the 
> > chances for typos in config files )
> 
> I thought the as documented behaviour was more logical, but then again
> I only write this stuff, not actually use it.  (-:

Personally, I like the solution that metze was proposing - but never had
the energy to fight that particular battle...

(sorry, can't find the mailing list ref atm).

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030912/dd78f7be/attachment.bin