What is different point between smbd/server.c and
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Oct 29 05:43:37 GMT 2003
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 16:27, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Tae-ho Kim wrote:
> > Hi! gurus!
> > Would you explain the differrence between smbd/server.c and wrepid/server.c?
> > Why did you make different type of server.c
> > Would you?
> wrepld is the experimental WINS replication daemon. Nothing to do with smb
> services. The name is the same, but the code is completely different.
That didn't stop Samba-TNG from using the same file for both. It makes
rather an interesting approach - one that you need if you want one
They have a single server.c, which makes a single server.o - and it's
all the other files that are linked in that determines the behaviour of
the final product. It's interesting, but for samba's 4 or so, almost
all compleatly different servers, it doesn't make nearly as much sense.
What would make more sense is cleaning up our client code to use more
common functions, arguments etc :-)
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20031029/5001645f/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical