[PATCH] MungedDial field in LDAPSAM
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Nov 26 21:06:22 GMT 2003
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 20:19, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 22:00, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 01:44, Aurélien Degrémont wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > To complete my previous patch concerning the MungedD ial field, here is
> > > some code to add it inside LDAPSAM.
> > >
> > > This code has been succesfully tested with NT4 TSE, W2k + TS, W2k3 + TS
> > > and it works well. Samba can handle TS Servers has member servers if the
> > > MungedDial field is correctly stored.
> > Before we fix this in stone, can we find out this field's real name?
> > It's been called the 'munged dialback string' because that's what was
> > the most common thing to see in there, but it looks more like an
> > application random bits of data store. I'm sure MS has a nice pretty
> > name for it :-)
> Afaik the name is right, it's just that MS has then reused it to store
> more data without changing the sAM format.
OK - then lets see if we can get this patch in before 3.0.1, to avoid
having tdbsam and ldapsam out of sync :-)
(I suppose that means I'll need to get back into a patching mood this
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20031127/99cd90d6/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical