Samba 2.2.7 Oddities
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Thu Nov 6 18:11:26 GMT 2003
Mike is lead coder on jCIFS and he's probably testing some stuff out.
Those two issues probably should be checked against 2.2.8a and 3.0.x.
Would be worth knowing that they've been nailed.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:24:48AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > >
> > >> I noticed two entirly unrelated strange things about Samba
> > >> 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix today.
> > >
> > > Ummm, 2.2.7 is, ummm, old.
> > Are you saying I should be using 3.0? Otherwise is 2.2.8 really that
> > different?
> Well, a lot of work went into 2.2.8a, so I would suggest that. However,
> 3.0.0 is much better in so many ways.
> Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
> sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the samba-technical