Unable to open new log file /var/samba/log.smbd: No such file
boehm at nortelnetworks.com
Wed May 14 13:14:32 GMT 2003
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Edgar, Bob wrote:
>>>>> "Bob" == Edgar, Bob <Bob.Edgar at commerzbankib.com> writes:
Bob> Yes, this is _not_ 64 bit compiled. I'm always reluctant to
Bob> build things 64 bit that don't require it because they don't
Bob> get much testing. Perhaps I wasn't clear with my question:
Bob> Has anyone been running samba 64 bit on Solaris 7, 8, and 9?
Bob> The real question: Is samba 64 bit clean? If it is, perhaps
Bob> it would be a good thing to add a configure switch to build
Bob> 64 bit when the compiler supports it?
I've been running it 64-bit since January 2001 -- more than 2
years. I've been using it in multiple geographic locations supporting
ClearCase users on Windows. I haven't seen any problems related to
64-bit in that time.
I don't think configure needs a special switch. The instructions I
sent you show that you only need to specify compiler switches.
Bob> I do think that the DEBUG message in debug.c could be fixed
Bob> to say the failure was "no more streams" if errno isn't set.
I agree, but I don't think it will happen. You would have to do this
for every sys_fopen (there are about 56). I believe that they made
changes to Samba 3.0 so that it no longer uses fopen.
Eric M. Boehm /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
boehm at nortelnetworks.com \ / No HTML or RTF in mail
X No proprietary word-processing
Respect Open Standards / \ files in mail
More information about the samba-technical