jelmer at samba.org
Thu May 8 10:51:50 GMT 2003
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 07:19:40AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re: register events':
> At 21:45 07.05.2003 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 07:19:50PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote
> >about 'Re: register events':
> >> At 05:44 07.05.2003 +0000, jra at dp.samba.org wrote:
> >> >On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 07:16:57AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
> >> >> At 05:07 07.05.2003 +0000, jra at dp.samba.org wrote:
> >> >> ok. substitute int with smb_event_id_t
> >> >> but with kind of funtion would you preferr? the first on?
> >> >Yes, if there is only one kind of error (ENOMEM) that
> >> >can be returned.
> >> In theorie we could run outof event_id's....
> >> Jelmer, what would you preferr?
> >I would prefer something like this:
> >int smb_register_exit_event(void (*function) (void *data), void
> >BOOL smb_unregister_exit_event(int event_id);
> >int smb_register_idle_event(time_t interval = 0, void (*function) (time_t
> >now, time_t interval, void *data), void *data);
> >BOOL smb_unregister_idle_event(int event_id);
> Ok, I'm fine with it...
> Should I or will you code that?
I'm a little busy with my exams right now so I'd be happy if you could
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030508/ff88c042/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical