smb_register_*() fakes for nmbd ...

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at
Wed May 7 20:23:39 GMT 2003

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote about 'Re: smb_register_*() fakes for nmbd ...':
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:35:21PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'smb_register_*() fakes for nmbd ...':
> > Hi Jelmer,

> > here's the full patch for faking up smb_register_fn's for nmbd and 
> > friends...

> Thanks metze,

> I'm currently testing this patch. I wasn't happy with the way you
> defined the HAVE_SMB_REGISTER_* defines. I think that should happen in
> the C source file after which we include the inline functions.

> Also, I'm not sure whether inline functions should be in a header file
> or a source file. Any C gurus awake?
The name 'include/subsystem.h' is a bit misleading. I would prefer something 
like 'module_subs.h'.


Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at> -
 22:22:11 up 4 days, 21:51, 16 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.69, 0.78
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list