register events

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

At 05:44 07.05.2003 +0000, jra at dp.samba.org wrote:
>On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 07:16:57AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > At 05:07 07.05.2003 +0000, jra at dp.samba.org wrote:
> > >On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 07:05:59AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > what will  be better:
> > > >
> > > > int smb_register_*_event(event_struct *event)
> > > > {
> > > >                  return event_id;
> > > > }
> > >
> > >Errr. None of them. typedef a new int type of smb_event_t
> > >and return that - #define zero as SMB_REGISTER_EVENT_FAIL
> > >(I'm expecting the only possible failure will be ENOMEM).
> >
> > ok. substitute int with smb_event_id_t
> >
> > but with kind of funtion would you preferr? the first on?
>
>Yes, if there is only one kind of error (ENOMEM) that
>can be returned.

In theorie we could run outof event_id's....

Jelmer, what would you preferr?



metze
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <metze at metzemix.de>