feedback on [BUG 62]
vorlon at netexpress.net
Tue May 6 15:32:19 GMT 2003
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> 'add machine script' needs fallback to 'add user script'
> for 2.2->3.0 upgrades
> Can people give me some feedback on this. I have reservations
> about falling back if the 'add machine script' does not exist
> and am perfectly fine leaving things as they are now in the 3.0
> code as long as it gets included in the release notes/upgrade
If you make an empty add machine script behave like 'add user script',
how do you represent the semantics currently given by an empty add
machine script? I think you have to break backwards compatibility at
some point, and now's the best time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030506/8843c94f/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical