feedback on [BUG 62]

Steve Langasek vorlon at
Tue May 6 15:32:19 GMT 2003

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:

> 'add machine script' needs fallback to 'add user script' 
>   for 2.2->3.0 upgrades

> Can people give me some feedback on this.  I have reservations
> about falling back if the 'add machine script' does not exist
> and am perfectly fine leaving things as they are now in the 3.0 
> code as long as it gets included in the release notes/upgrade 
> section.

If you make an empty add machine script behave like 'add user script',
how do you represent the semantics currently given by an empty add
machine script?  I think you have to break backwards compatibility at
some point, and now's the best time.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list