When the keep-alive packet sent out,rfc1002 says different things!!

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:42, Aladdin_Cai at asus.com.cn wrote:
> Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using wattcp, 
> I found a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims.
> In rfc 1002,see below:

> So,during I write data or read data to server, it seems that server will 
> not send me any keep-alive packet because he will reset the timer.But
> in fact,during I raw write a very large piece data to server(not
> matter windows or linux),it will send me a keep-alive
> occasionally,leading my defendless code crash.
> I REALLY don't understand why they don't obey the rules,or do I mistake rfc1002?
>  
> Urgently hope for your kindly help,thank you!!!!

See www.ubiqx.org/cifs for a description of this horrid protocol...

Also, make sure you understand - the standard is what Microsoft does,
not what what any RFC says.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030331/61757b0a/attachment.bin