[PATCH] Better fix for devicetype?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Tue Mar 25 16:28:55 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Would this be a better fix for the devicetype problem?
I may be blind here, but the only difference in your patch that
I see is some rewritten debug messages. What am I overlooking?
> It looks like we are putting the strings into the buffer twice, and we
> are not returning the 'fixed' devicetype for both protocol levels (< NT1
> and NT1).
>
> What happened here is that jermey 'fixed' a const warning. This meant
> that this 'in/out' buffer became an 'in' buffer, and we didn't push the
> correct devicetype back to the wire.
>
> Volker then tried to fix the specific case he hit.
I could gripe about serious regressions here but I won't....
Not so much aimed at any one in particular....
cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."
--John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
iD8DBQE+gIPLIR7qMdg1EfYRAtthAKCKEVVXzUUcNlSfO1MbYo2cJhtZBACg7J+C
EyxqWrdm57jcnZRDtmUivTg=
=1ig+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list