scalability of print_queue_update

[John E. Malmberg]

Martin Pool wrote:
> 
> Alternatively we might say that 40,000 jobs is a silly number to have
> queued. :-)

Probably, but it would be good to know that it would work.

What I am curious about is if you have a solution to a question I posed 
about a year ago.

On Windows, the print job number appears to be an unsigned 16 bit number 
if I remember correctly.

On OpenVMS, the print job number is an unsigned 32 bit number.  This 
number range is also shared with batch jobs.

Is there any way for SAMBA to accomodate 32 bit print job IDs?

-John
wb8tyw at qsl.network
Personal Opinion Only