order of idmap backends
simo.sorce at xsec.it
Thu Jun 26 08:22:20 GMT 2003
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 22:32, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:24:06PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> > why did you change DLIST_ADD() to DLIST_ADD_END() ?
> > in smb_register_idmap()
> > why is the order important?
> > we should have this in sync with the other smb_register_*() functions!!!
> Because I thought the order was important. It *should* be !
> This is very broken right now....
The original idea is that you may have only 2 backends:
local (eg: fixed to tdb)
and remote (eg: ldap, winbind ...)
So the order should be fixed inside the code.
I do not know if anybody added more layers, if so, then he have to
explain why and how they are supposed to work.
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030626/6a403881/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical