order of idmap backends

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at metzemix.de
Wed Jun 25 20:39:14 GMT 2003

At 20:32 25.06.2003 +0000, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:24:06PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > why did you change DLIST_ADD() to DLIST_ADD_END() ?
> >
> > in smb_register_idmap()
> >
> > why is the order important?
> >
> > we should have this in sync with the other smb_register_*() functions!!!
>Because I thought the order was important. It *should* be !
>This is very broken right now....

I think it's not impartant and also should not be important!!!
(we just search in a linked list and it doesn't matter on which position 
and list element is!)

and I can't see were it's broken.

I only thing is that we lookup the local idmap also in the lists of remote 
I don't like this...

Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <metze at metzemix.de> 

More information about the samba-technical mailing list