sambaSID in the sambaSamAccount a good idea?
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Wed Jun 25 07:11:23 GMT 2003
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:55:12AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> The correct solution (for which I'll produce a patch) is to assert that
> the SID stored in secrets.tdb is always the SID stored in LDAP for the
> domain, and update secrets.tdb is we need to.
Hmmm. I'm still not convinced.
What does this gain us feature-wise, not implementation-wise? IMO a change in
behaviour should really be backed by a good new feature that we get.
A little argument might be that NT only stores the RID in its SAM as well, as
you can see from the SAM_ACCOUNT_INFO delta.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030625/6439ef99/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical