[PATCH] example/VFS ....confiure.in...
a.bokovoy at sam-solutions.net
Tue Jun 24 09:48:34 GMT 2003
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:35:12AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> >> Jerry, can you make sure that the VERSION string of samba matches this
> >> parsing scheme...
> >> in the SAMBA_3_0 and SAMBA_2_2 branches we should have "cvs" as version
> >> suffix
> >> (e.g. "3.0.0beta2cvs" or "3.0.0pre3cvs" or "3.0.0rc2")
> >> and the SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE and SAMBA_2_2_RELEASE branches should have the
> >> official versions.
> >> ("3.0.0beta2" or "3.0.0rc1" or "3.0.0")
> >I would better not make any attempt to count on particular string in
> >VERSION as we encourage vendors to change this string to their own if they
> >apply specific patches (regular behaviour). That means, if your logic is
> >based on content of VERSION string, it will likely fail.
> but it should still be something like "3.0.0beta1-SuSE" ...
Not exactly. It might be, for example, "3.0/ALT" as we do in our ALT Linux
packages because we have continuous Samba 3.0 builds without separation on
beta/alpha/cvs snapshot for more than 1.5 year now. Actual source code
versioning is mentioned in the package itself.
> and parsing this string is the best thing we can do for dealing with samba
> 2.2.* and 3.0aplha* and 3.0.0beta1
Why you need to parse that at all?
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Money cannot buy love, nor even friendship.
More information about the samba-technical