Deadlock with libsmbclient functions and
Multiple forked processes
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 13 14:24:29 GMT 2003
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 00:23, Akshay V Rao wrote:
> Well, in each forked process I perform an smbc_open(), smbc_read(), and
> smbc_close(). Do I need to do an smbc_init() before I call these functions
> even though I already did an smbc_init() before I forked the processes?
Do you need your hand held for every step? Why not try it and see - you
should smbc_init() only after the fork().
You should use Samba 3.0 if you need to have a specific context to pass
around to avoid using the same one across the forked process.
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030613/8e6f0c39/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical