What is the largest Windows Terminal server installation peop le have seen?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 03:16, JUNG, Christian wrote:
> Hi Javid!


> This would be nice! Actually Windows Terminal-Server tend to handle several
> sessions over a single TCP/IP-connection. So one TCP/IP-connection is used
> by several users. This implicates some problems. For example it seems to be
> impossible to map a printjob to the user who printed it:
> 
> User A prints on printer P. Afterwards user B prints on the same printer P.
> This goes over the same TCP/IP-connection. If you make some sort of
> print-accounting you will see, that user A has printed both jobs (his and
> that of user B). That's currently a problem here. I don't know if this has
> been fixed or if it is even possible. We're running Samba 2.2.5. This one
> hasn't got these problems. Newer versions have this problem.

Is this with CUPS?  I think I know what the issue is there...

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030603/ef1b6588/attachment.bin