What is the largest Windows Terminal server installation peop
le have seen?
christian.jung at saarstahl.com
Mon Jun 2 17:16:13 GMT 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:abduljavid at motorola.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:09 PM
> To: 'Richard Sharpe'; samba-technical at samba.org
> Subject: RE: What is the largest Windows Terminal server installation
> peop le have seen?
> Not sure what you meant by single tcp connection? And multiple smbds?
> Am assuing smbd runs on tcp/ip, so each sesssion should have a tcp
This would be nice! Actually Windows Terminal-Server tend to handle several
sessions over a single TCP/IP-connection. So one TCP/IP-connection is used
by several users. This implicates some problems. For example it seems to be
impossible to map a printjob to the user who printed it:
User A prints on printer P. Afterwards user B prints on the same printer P.
This goes over the same TCP/IP-connection. If you make some sort of
print-accounting you will see, that user A has printed both jobs (his and
that of user B). That's currently a problem here. I don't know if this has
been fixed or if it is even possible. We're running Samba 2.2.5. This one
hasn't got these problems. Newer versions have this problem.
More information about the samba-technical